| You can view your ratings and chess results on the CHESSA Ratings Database. |
|
Latest Merit List 9 Aug 2011
|
|
1. |
Introduction |
| |
The objective of this
document is to clarify the policies and procedures of the
Mid-Gauteng Chess Union Merit system.
A merit system is to be
used to determine a ranking system for all active
Mid-Gauteng Chess Union players to apply in the selection of
teams and allocation of awards. As mandated the system
should be mathematically consistent,
transparent, fair and prove integrity.
The merit system is
aligned to incentivising increased
activity and therefore discriminates against a lack of
activity. A chronological weight is applied to
recognise development of the player in the current measured
period.
|
|
1.1 |
Abbreviations &
Descriptions |
| |
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
|
RP
ARP
AgeI
Bye
Default
Tournament
|
–
- -–-
-
|
Performance Rating
Adjusted Performance
Rating
Age Inflation
As per the swiss or Round
Robin system definition
As per the swiss or Round
Robin system definition
FIDE or Chessa Rated
Normal Chess Tournament
|
|
1.2 |
Applies to:
|
| |
· All
active mid-Gauteng Chess Union Members |
|
2. |
Basis of calculation
|
| |
1. |
The
main merit system will be based on a ranking system of the
sum of the best performance ratings in tournaments in the
current year with straight line inflation depending on age
group. The premise of the system is similar to the well
understood Grand Prix system as displayed by Chessa and FIDE
barring the inflationary aspect. |
| |
2. |
Only
the best 2 tournaments will be used up to the 1st Inter-Union
of the year. Thereafter 3 tournaments will be used
except for the selection of the SAJCC U8 – U14 teams which
will be done using the following equation:

The
merit score of players who are not able to attend the closed
and that have been excused by the selection committee will
be determined using only the best 3 tournaments.
|
| |
3. |
Inflation of RP will be done using the following constants: |
| |
|
3.1 Age
group U8 – U10 – 1.5% per month.
3.2 Age
group U12 – U14 – 1% per month.
3.3 Age
group U16 – Open – 0.5% per month.
|
| |
|
Inflation is based on the assumed reduction in the learning
curve with age and is referred to as AgeI. |
| |
4. |
In the
case where a player is not awarded a rating yet the player
will be awarded a provisional rating. Provisional ratings
will be be applied per age group in line with the following: |
| |
|
4.1
U8 - 700
4.2
U10 - 900
4.3
U12 - 1100
4.4
U14 - 1300
4.5
U16 Open - 1500
|
|
3. |
Equation Elements |
| |
1. |
Performance Rating (RP):
|
| |
|
1.1 Performance
ratings should be determined using the FIDE RP formula:

|
| |
|
1.2 The
following criteria applies to performance rating: |
| |
|
i) Points
earned by virtue of a bye or default will be omitted from
the formula.
ii) At
least 4 valid games should be included in the performance
calculation of one tournament. Less valid games
will nullify the result of the tournament.
|
| |
2. |
Adjusted Performance Rating (ARP): |
| |
|
2.1 ARP
is determined by adding an AgeI percentage to the RP based
on the month of year. The formula is:

|
|
4. |
Criteria valid
tournaments
|
| |
1. |
All
the rated tournaments are merit tournaments and are marked
as such on the calendar. |
| |
2. |
All
other tournaments can be presented to the GM-committee for
approval as a merit tournament, should it achieve the
following criteria: |
| |
|
2.1 Data
must be supplied to GM in the Swiss Arbiter programme format
or as accepted by CHESSA
2.2 The
tournament must be CHESSA registered and rated.
2.3 There
must be at least 5 players in a section for Round Robin and
8 for Swiss tournaments.
2.4 Minimum
time schedule is 61/61 (Normal Chess)
2.5 Minimum
of 5 rounds
2.6 Personal
and contact details of all players must be available
2.7 Ratings
used in tournament for pairing purposes are not older than 2
publications prior to the start date of the
tournament.
|
|
5. |
Validity and consistency
of system
|
| |
1. |
The
system is dependant on a stable rating environment where
statistical consistency can be reasonably proven. It is
based on the CHESSA standard for calculation ratings as
published December 2009 and will be affected by changes on
the method. It is therefore required to re-evaluate the
system should any of the following elements change within
the CHESSA rating formulae: |
| |
|
1.1 New
ratings are determined using a minimum of 12 rated games.
1.2 The
K factor for ELO calculation does not exceed 30 for new
players.
1.3 General
alignment is kept to the FIDE ELO system.
|
|
6. |
Process for calculating
merit scores |
| |
1. |
Check
readability, consistency and validity of submitted
tournament data. |
| |
2. |
Substitute provisional ratings per age group. |
| |
3. |
Normalise score to exclude Bye and Default games. |
| |
4. |
Determine performance rating per player. |
| |
5. |
Append
merit point per player to main merit database. |
| |
6. |
Submit
merit calculation of tournament to merit committee for
ratification. |
| |
7. |
If
ratified, publish data.
|
|
7. |
Merit Committee
|
| |
1. |
A
merit committee should be established with a chairperson and
at least 2 other from the union. The merit committee’s
function is to: |
| |
|
1.1 Calculate
and audit the merit score of the union.
1.2 Interrogate
resultant merit scores and test against the intent of the
merit system.
1.3 Make
suggestions to improve the system.
|